IATG: Interpretation-analysis-based Testing Method for Autonomous Driving Software
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

TP311

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
  • |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    Autonomous driving software based on deep neural network (DNN) has become the most popular solution. Like traditional software, DNN can also produce incorrect output or unexpected behaviors, and DNN-based autonomous driving software has caused serious accidents, which seriously threaten life and property safety. Therefore, how to effectively test DNN-based autonomous driving software has become an urgent problem. Since it is difficult to predict and understand the behavior of DNNs, traditional software testing methods are no longer applicable. Existing autonomous driving software testing methods are implemented byadding pixel-level perturbations to original images or modifying the whole image to generate test data. The generated test data are quite different from the real images, and the perturbation-based methods are difficult to be understood. To solve the above problem, this study proposes a test data generation method, namely interpretability-analysis-based test data generation (IATG). Firstly, it uses the interpretation method for DNNs to generate visual explanations of decisions made by autonomous driving software and chooses objects in the original images that have significant impacts on the decisions. Then, it generates test data by replacing the chosen objects with other objects with the same semantics. The generated test data are more similar to the real image, and the process is more understandable. As an important part of the autonomous driving software’s decision-making module, the steering angle prediction model is used to conduct experiments. Experimental results show that the introduction of the interpretation method effectively enhances the ability of IATG to mislead the steering angle prediction model. Furthermore, when the misleading angle is the same, the test data generated by IATG are more similar to the real image than DeepTest; IATG has a stronger misleading ability than semSensFuzz, and the interpretation analysis based important object selection method of IATG can effectively improve the misleading ability of semSensFuzz.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

谢瑞麟,崔展齐,陈翔,郑丽伟. IATG: 基于解释分析的自动驾驶软件测试方法.软件学报,2024,35(6):2753-2774

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:May 08,2022
  • Revised:October 31,2022
  • Adopted:
  • Online: July 04,2023
  • Published:
You are the firstVisitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-4
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100190,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62562563 Fax:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063