Rule Inference Network Model for Classification
Author:
Affiliation:

Clc Number:

TP181

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61772250, U1936109, 61672127)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [32]
  • |
  • Related [20]
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    The black-box working mechanism of artificial neutral network brings the confusion of interpretability. Therefore, a rule inference network is proposed based on rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach (RIMER). It is interpretable by the rules and the inference engine in RIMER. In the present work, the partial derivatives of inference functions are proved as the theoretical fundamental of the proposed model. The framework and the learning algorithm of rule inference network for classification are presented. The feed forward of rule inference network using the inference process in RIMER contributes for the interpretability. Meanwhile, parameters in belief rule base such as attribute weights, rule weights and belief degree of consequents are trained by gradient descent as in neural network for belief rule base establishment. Moreover, the gradient is simplified by proposing the "pseudo gradient" to reduce the learning complex during the training process. The experimental results indicate the advantages of proposed rule inference network on both interpretability and learning capability. It shows that the rule inference network performs well when the scale of the training dataset is small, and when the training data scale increases, it also achieves comforting results.

    Reference
    [1] Zhang QS, Zhu SC. Visual interpretability for deep learning:A survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 2018,19(1):27-39.
    [2] Grégoire M, Sebastian L, Alexander B, et al. Explaining nonlinear classification decisions with deep Taylor decomposition. Pattern Recognition, 2017,65:211-222.
    [3] Petru M, Young JL, Charles C, et al. Accurate and interpretable classification of microspectroscopy pixels using artificial neural networks. Medical Image Analysis, 2017,37:37-45.
    [4] Irene S, Sebastian L, Wojciech S, et al. Interpretable deep neural networks for single-trial EEG classification. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 2016,274:141-145.
    [5] Grégoire M, Wojciech S, Klaus-Robert M. Methods for interpreting and understanding deep neural networks. Digital Signal Processing, 2018,73:1-15.
    [6] Dai YL, Wang GJ, Li KC. Conceptual alignment deep neural networks. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 2018,34:1631-1642.
    [7] Nhathai P, Dou DJ, Wang H, et al. Ontology-based deep learning for human behavior prediction with explanations in health social networks. Information Sciences, 2017,384:298-313.
    [8] Sun R. Robust reasoning:Integrating rule-based and similarity-based reasoning. Articial Intelligence, 1995,75(2):241-295.
    [9] Yang ZL, Wang J. Use of fuzzy risk assessment in FMEA of offshore engineering systems. Ocean Engineering, 2015,95:195-204.
    [10] Zhou ZJ, Hua CH, Yang JB, et al. Online updating belief rule based system for pipeline leak detection under expert intervention. Expert Systems with Applications, 2009,36(4):7700-7709.
    [11] Chen SW, Liu J, Wang H, et al. A group decision making model for partially ordered preference under uncertainty. Information Fusion, 2015,25:32-41.
    [12] Yang JB, Liu J, Wang J, et al. Belief rule-base inference methodology using the evidential reasoning approach-RIMER. IEEE Trans. on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans, 2006,36(2):266-285.
    [13] Guo M. A belief-rule-based inference method for modeling systems under uncertainties. Systems Engineering -Theory & Practice, 2016,36(8):1975-1982(in Chinese with English abstract).
    [14] Kong GL, Xu DL, Yang JB. Belief rule-based inference for predicting trauma outcome. Knowledge-based Systems, 2016,95:35-44.
    [15] Yang Y, Wang J, Wang G, et al. Research and development project risk assessment using a belief rule-based system with random subspaces. Knowledge-based Systems, 2019,178:51-60.
    [16] Gao X, Lyu W, Qi L, et al. RIMER and SA based thermal efficiency optimization for fired heaters. FUEL, 2017,205:272-285.
    [17] Cheng C, Wang JH, Teng WX, et al. Health status prediction based on belief rule base for high-speed train running gear system. IEEE Access, 2019,7:4145-4159.
    [18] Wei H, Hu GY, Zhou, ZJ, et al. A new BRB model for security-state assessment of cloud computing based on the impact of external and internal environments. Computers & Security, 2018,73:207-218.
    [19] Jin LQ, Liu J, Xu Y, et al. A novel rule base representation and its inference method using the evidential reasoning approach. Konwledge-based Systems, 2015,87:80-91.
    [20] Yang JB, Liu J, Xu DL, et al. Optimization models for training belief-rule-based systems. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A:Systems and Humans, 2007,37(4):569-585.
    [21] Clazada A, Liu J, Wang H, et al. A new dynamic rule activation method for extended belief rule-based systems. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge & Data Engineering 2015,27(4):880-894.
    [22] Liu J, Luis M, Calzada A. A novel belief rule base representation, generation and its inference methodology. Knowledge-based Systems, 2013,53:129-141.
    [23] Zhu H, Zhao J, Xu Y. Interval-valued belief rule inference methodology based on evidential reasoning-IRIMER. Int'l Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 2016,15(6):1345-1366.
    [24] Chang LL, Zhou Y, Jiang J. Structure learning for belief rule base expert system-a comparative study. Knowledge-based Systems, 2013,39:159-172.
    [25] Wang YM, Yang LH, Fu YG. Dynamic rule adjustment approach for optimizing belief rule-base expert system. Knowledge-based Systems, 2016,96:40-60.
    [26] Sun JB, Huang J X, Chang LL, et al. BRBcast:A new approach to belief rule-based system parameter learning via extended causal strength logic. Information Sciences, 2018,444:51-71.
    [27] Chang LL, Zhou ZJ, Chen YW, et al. Akaike information criterion-based conjunctive belief rule base learning for complex system modeling. Knowledge-based Systems, 2018,161:47-64.
    [28] Tang XL, Xiao MQ, Liang YJ, et al. Online updating belief-rule-base using Bayesian estimation. Knowledge-based Systems, 2019,171:93-105.
    [29] Jang J. Anfis-adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system. IEEE Trans. on Systems Man and Cybernetics, 1993,23(3):665-685.
    [30] Wang DH, Li M. Stochastic configuration networks:fundamentals and algorithms. IEEE Trans. on Cybernetics, 2017,47(10):3466-3479.
    附中文参考文献:
    [13] 郭敏.基于置信规则库推理的不确定性建模研究.系统工程理论与实践,2016,36(8):1975-1982.
    Cited by
    Comments
    Comments
    分享到微博
    Submit
Get Citation

黄德根,张云霞,林红梅,邹丽,刘壮.基于规则推理网络的分类模型.软件学报,2020,31(4):1063-1078

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:2877
  • PDF: 4668
  • HTML: 1967
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:March 10,2019
  • Revised:July 11,2019
  • Online: January 14,2020
  • Published: April 06,2020
You are the first2051087Visitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-4
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100190,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62562563 Fax:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063