Practical Impacts of Automation Tools in Support of DevOps in China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (61572251); State Key Laboratory for Novel Software Technology (Nanjing University) (KFKT2017A13)

  • Article
  • | |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference [38]
  • |
  • Related
  • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    As a revolution in software engineering, there are many reasons for the rapid development of DevOps in the past ten years. This study focuses on the practical impact of automation tools in the Chinese DevOps practice and a series of problems arising from automation tools. Systematic Literature Review (SLR) is used to identify the most popular tools, and finally 69 automation tools are identified from 50 researches, including Docker, Chef, Jenkins, and Puppet. Three levels of problems of automation tools in DevOps are summarized from some Chinese blogs using Gray Literature Review (GRL). Finally, ethnographic interview is used to analyze the opinions and suggestions from three aspects of DevOps practice in China, obtaining two effects of the automation tools:1) the role of automation tools in the DevOps practice is obvious at the beginning, and DevOps practice is considered using automation tools; 2) software organizations need to reduce the dependence on automation tools and form their own culture of DevOps. To solve the problems of automation tools in Chinese DevOps practice, this paper summarizes three suggestions from the interview and gives a paradigm.

    Reference
    [1] John A, Paul H. 10+ deploys per day:Dev and Ops cooperation at Flickr. In:Proc. of the Web Performance and Operations Conf. Velocity, 2009.
    [2] Dyck A, Penners R, Lichter H. Towards definitions for release engineering and DevOps. In:Proc. of the 3rd IEEE/ACM Int'l Workshop on Release Engineering. IEEE, 2015. 3.
    [3] Nitto ED, Guerriero M, Tamburri DA. DevOps:Introducing infrastructure-as-code. In:Proc. of the 39th IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering Companion (ICSE-C). IEEE Press, 2017. 497-498.
    [4] Breno B. de França N, Jeronimo H, Travassos GH. Characterizing DevOps by hearing multiple voices. In:Proc. of the 30th Brazilian Symp. on Software Engineering. ACM Press, 2016. 53-62.
    [5] Jabbari R, Ali NB, Kai P, et al. What is DevOps? A systematic mapping study on definitions and practices. In:Proc. of the Scientific Workshop of XP 2016. ACM Press, 2016. 12.
    [6] Puppet. 2017 State of DevOps Report. London, 2017. https://puppet.com/resources/whitepaper/state-of-devops-report
    [7] Fuing Y. A Short History of Chinese Philosophy. New York:The Free Press, 2017.
    [8] Myers DG. Social Psychology. Beijing:Posts & Telecommunications Press, 2016(in Chinese).
    [9] Nanjing University. 2018 DevOps Report in China. Nanjing, 2018(in Chinese).
    [10] Rong GP, Zhang H, Shao D, et al. DevOps:Principle, Methods and Practices. Beijing:China Machine Press, 2017(in Chinese).
    [11] Ebert C, Gallardo G, Hernantes J, et al. DevOps. IEEE Software, 2016,33(3):94-100.
    [12] Httermann M. DevOps for Developers. New York:Apress, 2012.
    [13] Vaasanthi R, Prasanna V, Philip S. Analysis of DevOps tools using the traditional data mining techniques. Int'l Journal of Computer Applications, 2017,161(11):47-49.
    [14] Kersten M. A Cambrian explosion of DevOps tools. IEEE Software, 2018,35(2):14-17.
    [15] Farcic V. The DevOps 2.0 Toolkit. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016.
    [16] Farcic V. The DevOps 2.1 Toolkit. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2017.
    [17] Kitchenham BA, Dyba T, Jorgensen M. Evidence-based software engineering. Perspectives on Data Science for Software Engineering, 2004,22(1):149-153.
    [18] Zhang H, Babar MA, Tell P. Identifying relevant studies in software engineering. Information & Software Technology, 2011,53(6):625-637.
    [19] Li SS, et al. A state report of DevOps tooling. Nanjing, 2018(in Chinese). http://softeng.nju.edu.cn/tech_reports/Tech-Report-devops4tools-2018.pdf
    [20] Garousi V, Felderer M. The need for multivocal literature reviews in software engineering:Complementing systematic literature reviews with grey literature. In:Proc. of the 20th Int'l Conf. on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering. ACM Press, 2016. 26.
    [21] Herbert S. For ethnography. Progress in Human Geography, 2000,24(4):550-568.
    [22] Fetterman DM. Ethnography in educational research:The dynamics of diffusion. Educational Researcher, 1982,11(3):17-29.
    [23] Clifford J, Marcus GE. Writing Culture:The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. University of California Press, 1986.
    [24] Ingold T. That's enough about ethnography. HAU:Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 2014,4(1):383-395.
    [25] Fetterman DM. Ethnography:Step by Step. 3rd ed., Sage Publications, 2009.
    [26] Hammersley M. What is ethnography? Can it survive? Should it. Ethnography and Education, 2018,13(1):1-17.
    [27] Hughes JA. Ethnography, plans and software engineering. In:Proc. of the IET Conf. IET, 1995.
    [28] Hammersley M, Atkinson P. Ethnography:Principles in Practice. Abingdon:Routledge, 2007.
    [29] Rubin HJ, Rubin IS. Qualitative Interviewing:The Art of Hearing Data. Sage Publications, 2011.
    [30] Van Maanen J. Tales of the Field:On Writing Ethnography. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2011.
    [31] Kozinets RV. Netnography:Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage Publications, 2010.
    [32] Stol KJ, Ralph P, Fitzgerald B. Grounded theory in software engineering research:A critical review and guidelines. In:Proc. of the 38th IEEE/ACM Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE). IEEE, 2016. 120-131.
    [33] Cruzes DS, Dyba T. Recommended steps for thematic synthesis in software engineering. In:Proc. of the Int'l Symp. on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement. IEEE, 2011. 275-284.
    [34] Hackman JR. Collaborative Intelligence:Using Teams to Solve Hard Problems. San Francisco:Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2011.
    附中文参考文献:
    [9] 南京大学.2018 DevOps中国调查报告.南京,2018.
    [10] 荣国平,张贺,邵栋,等.DevOps:原理、方法与实践.北京:机械工业出版社,2017.
    [19] 李杉杉,等.DevOps自动化支持工具调研.南京,2018. http://softeng.nju.edu.cn/tech_reports/Tech-Report-devops4tools-2018.pdf
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

黄璜,张贺,邵栋.自动化工具对中国DevOps实践的影响.软件学报,2019,30(10):3056-3070

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:4470
  • PDF: 7239
  • HTML: 3298
  • Cited by: 0
History
  • Received:July 10,2018
  • Revised:October 31,2018
  • Online: May 16,2019
You are the first2036741Visitors
Copyright: Institute of Software, Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing ICP No. 05046678-4
Address:4# South Fourth Street, Zhong Guan Cun, Beijing 100190,Postal Code:100190
Phone:010-62562563 Fax:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
Technical Support:Beijing Qinyun Technology Development Co., Ltd.

Beijing Public Network Security No. 11040202500063