个性化学习路径推荐
作者:
作者单位:

西北工业大学

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(面上项目,重点项目,重大项目) ,中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金, 西北工业大学教育改革基金


State-of-the-Art Survey of Personalized Learning Path Recommendation
Author:
Affiliation:

Northwestern Polytechnical University

Fund Project:

Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese Young Scholars,Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities, Education and Teaching Reform Research Project of Northwestern Polytechnical University

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [124]
  • | |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    近年来,伴随着现代信息技术的迅猛发展,以人工智能为代表的新兴技术在教育领域得到了广泛应用,引发了学习理念和方式的深刻变革。在这种大背景下,在线学习超越了时空的限制,为学习者“随时随地”学习提供了更多的可能性,从而得到了蓬勃发展。然而,在线学习中师生时间、空间分离的特征,导致教师无法及时掌握学生的学习状态,一定程度上制约了在线学习中教学质量的提升。面对多元化的学习需求及海量学习资源,如何迅速完成学习目标、降低学习成本、合理分配学习资源等问题成为限制个人和时代发展的重大问题。然而,传统的“一刀切”的教育模式已经不能满足人们获取知识的需求了,我们需要一个更高效、更科学的个性化教育模式,以帮助学习者以最小的学习成本最大限度地完成学习目标。基于以上背景,如何自动高效识别学习者特征,高效地组织和分配学习资源,为每一位学习者规划个性化路径,成为面向个体的精准化教育资源匹配机制研究中亟待解决的问题。在本文中,我们系统地了综述并分析了当前个性化学习路径推荐的研究现状,并从多学科领域的角度分析了对于同一问题的不同研究思路,同时我们也归纳总结了当前研究中最为主流的核心推荐算法。最后,我们强调当前研究存在的主要不足之处

    Abstract:

    Recently, with the rapid development of information technology, emerging technologies represented by artificial intelligence are widly applied in education, triggering profound changes in the concept and mode of learning. And, online learning transcends the limitations of time and space, providing more possibilities for learners to learn “anytime and anywhere”. However, the separation of time and space of teachers and students in online learning makes teachers could not handle students’ learning process, limits the quality of teaching and learning. Diversified learning targets and massive learning resources generate some new problems, i.e., how to quickly accomplish learning targets, reduce learning costs and reasonably allocate learning resources. And these problems have become the limitations of the development of individuals and the society. However, traditional “one -size -fits-all” educational model can no longer fit human’s nedds, thus, we need one more effieient and scientific personalized education model to help learners maximize their learning targets with minimal learning costs. Based on these considerations, what we need is to new adaptive learning system which could automatically and efficiently identify learner personalized characteristics, efficiently organize and allocate learning resources, and plan a global personalized learning path. In this paper, we systematically review and analyze the current researches on personalized learning path recommendation, and we analyze different research sight from multidisciplinary perspective. Then, we summarize the most applied algorithm in current research. Finally, we highlight the main shortcomings of the current rearch, which we should pay more attention to.

    参考文献
    [1] CHEN M, TONG M, LIU C, et al. Recommendation of learning path using an improved ACO based on novel coordinate system; proceedings of the 2017 6th IIAI International Congress on Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), F, 2017 [C]. IEEE.
    [2] ZHANG R, LIU ZY, LI MX. A Review of Research on Personalized Learning Path [J]. 2020, 3
    [3] BRAY B, MCCLASKEY K J L, TECHNOLOGY L W. A Step-by-Step Guide to Personalize Learning [J]. 2013, 40(7): 12-9.
    [4] NABIZADEH A H, LEAL J P, RAFSANJANI H N, et al. Learning path personalization and recommendation methods: A survey of the state-of-the-art [J]. 2020, 113596.
    [5] AROYO L, DOLOG P, HOUBEN G-J, et al. Interoperability in personalized adaptive learning [J]. 2006, 9(2): 4-18.
    [6] MCGAGHIE W C, ISSENBERG S B, BARSUK J H, et al. A critical review of simulation based mastery learning with translational outcomes [J]. 2014, 48(4): 375-85.
    [7] ZHU J, ZHANG LJ, Journal of South China Normal University J. A Review of Data-Driven Personalized Adaptive Learning Research [J]. 2020, 52(4): 17-25.
    [8] ZHU H, TIAN F, WU K, et al. A multi-constraint learning path recommendation algorithm based on knowledge map [J]. 2018, 143(102-14.
    [9] SCHLEICHER A J O P. PISA 2018: Insights and Interpretations [J]. 2019.
    [10] ESSALMI F, AYED L J B, JEMNI M, et al. Generalized metrics for the analysis of E-learning personalization strategies [J]. 2015, 48(310-22.
    [11] JIN Q. Intelligent Learning Systems and Advancements in Computer-Aided Instruction: Emerging Studies: Emerging Studies [M]. IGI Global, 2011.
    [12] ALIAN M, JABRI R J J O A S. A Shortest Adaptive Learning Path in eLearning Systems: Mathematical View [J]. 2009, 5(6):
    [13] DURAND G, LAPLANTE F, KOP R. A learning design recommendation system based on markov decision processes; proceedings of the KDD 2011 Workshop: Knowledge Discovery in Educational Data, ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2011) in San Diego, CA, F, 2011 [C].
    [14] BELACEL N, DURAND G, LAPLANTE F. A Binary Integer Programming Model for Global Optimization of Learning Path Discovery; proceedings of the EDM (Workshops), F, 2014 [C]. Citeseer.
    [15] CHI Y. Developing curriculum sequencing for managing multiple texts in e-learning system; proceedings of the Proceedings of international conference on engineering education, F, 2010 [C].
    [16] SEGAL A, GAL K, SHANI G, et al. A difficulty ranking approach to personalization in E-learning [J]. 2019, 130(261-72.
    [17] ADORNI G, KOCEVA F. Educational concept maps for personalized learning path generation; proceedings of the Conference of the Italian Association for Artificial Intelligence, F, 2016 [C]. Springer.
    [18] RAFSANJANI A H N. A long term goal recommender approach for learning environments [J]. 2018,
    [19] DERRY S J, MURPHY D A J R O E R. Designing systems that train learning ability: From theory to practice [J]. 1986, 56(1): 1-39.
    [20] XIA M, SUN M, WEI H, et al. Peerlens: Peer-inspired interactive learning path planning in online question pool; proceedings of the Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, F, 2019 [C].
    [21] YANG F, LI F W, LAU R W. Learning path construction based on association link network; proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Based Learning, F, 2012 [C]. Springer.
    [22] PIECH C, BUMBACHER E, DAVIS R. Measuring Ability-to-Learn Using Parametric Learning-Gain Functions; proceedings of the Proceedings of The 13th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (EDM 2020), F, 2020 [C]. ERIC.
    [23] SALAHLI M A, ?ZDEMIR M, YASAR C J I E S. Concept Based Approach for Adaptive Personalized Course Learning System [J]. 2013, 6(5): 92-103.
    [24] LIU Q, TONG S, LIU C, et al. Exploiting cognitive structure for adaptive learning; proceedings of the Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, F, 2019 [C].
    [25] YARANDI M, JAHANKHANI H, TAWIL A J W. A personalized adaptive e-learning approach based on semantic web technology [J]. 2013, 10(2): Art. 110.
    [26] NABIZADEH A H, GON?ALVES D, GAMA S, et al. Adaptive learning path recommender approach using auxiliary learning objects [J]. 2020, 147(103777.
    [27] DHARANI B, GEETHA T. Adaptive learning path generation using colored Petri nets based on behavioral aspects; proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT), F, 2013 [C]. IEEE.
    [28] IGLESIAS J A, ANGELOV P, LEDEZMA A, et al. Creating evolving user behavior profiles automatically [J]. 2011, 24(5): 854-67.
    [29] XIE H, ZOU D, WANG F L, et al. Discover learning path for group users: A profile-based approach [J]. 2017, 254(59-70.
    [30] GARRIDO TEJERO A, FERNáNDEZ S, ONAINDIA DE LA RIVAHERRERA E, et al. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning [J]. 2013, 28(2): 121-36.
    [31] NABIZADEH A H, MáRIO JORGE A, PAULO LEAL J. Rutico- Recommending successful learning paths under time constraints; proceedings of the Adjunct publication of the 25th conference on user modeling, adaptation and personalization, F, 2017 [C].
    [32] XU D, WANG Z, CHEN K, et al. Personalized learning path recommender based on user profile using social tags; proceedings of the 2012 Fifth International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design, F, 2012 [C]. IEEE.
    [33] KLA?NJA-MILI?EVI? A, VESIN B, IVANOVI? M, et al. E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification [J]. 2011, 56(3): 885-99.
    [34] BIAN C-L, WANG D-L, LIU S-Y, et al. Adaptive learning path recommendation based on graph theory and an improved immune algorithm [J]. 2019, 13(5): 2277-98.
    [35] ESSALMI F, AYED L J B, JEMNI M, et al. A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios [J]. 2010, 26(4): 581-91.
    [36] KOLB D J E L. Individuality in learning and the concept of learning styles [J]. 1984, 61-98.
    [37] MA JF. An analysis of the impact of learning styles on teachers'' collaborative learning [D], 2009.
    [38] SáNCHEZ GORDóN S, LUJáN-MORA S. Adaptive content presentation extension for open edX. Enhancing MOOCs accessibility for users with disabilities [J]. 2015,
    [39] SUAZO I G, RODRíGUEZ C G, RIVAS M C. Generating adaptive learning paths in e-learning environments; proceedings of the 2012 XXXVIII Conferencia Latinoamericana En Informatica (CLEI), F, 2012 [C]. IEEE.
    [40] WILKOWSKI J, DEUTSCH A, RUSSELL D M. Student skill and goal achievement in the mapping with google MOOC; proceedings of the Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference, F, 2014 [C].
    [41] BHASKAR M, DAS M M, CHITHRALEKHA T, et al. Genetic algorithm based adaptive learning scheme generation for context aware e-learning [J]. 2010, 2(4): 1271-9.
    [42] CARCHIOLO V, LONGHEU A, MALGERI M J I S. Reliable peers and useful resources: Searching for the best personalised learning path in a trust-and recommendation-aware environment [J]. 2010, 180(10): 1893-907.
    [43] KARDAN A A, EBRAHIM M A, IMANI M B J I J O S R. A new personalized learning path generation method: Aco-map [J]. 2014, 5(1): 17.
    [44] FENG X, XIE H, PENG Y, et al. Groupized learning path discovery based on member profile; proceedings of the International conference on web-based learning, F, 2010 [C]. Springer.
    [45] LIN C F, YEH Y-C, HUNG Y H, et al. Data mining for providing a personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees [J]. 2013, 68(199-210.
    [46] DURAND G, BELACEL N, LAPLANTE F J I S. Graph theory based model for learning path recommendation [J]. 2013, 251(10-21.
    [47] BASU P, BHATTACHARYA S, ROY S. Online recommendation of learning path for an e-learner under virtual university; proceedings of the International conference on distributed computing and internet technology, F, 2013 [C]. Springer.
    [48] LI Z, PAPAEMMANOUIL O, KOUTRIKA G. Coursenavigator: interactive learning path exploration; proceedings of the Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Exploratory Search in Databases and the Web, F, 2016 [C].
    [49] ZHOU Y, HUANG C, HU Q, et al. Personalized learning full-path recommendation model based on LSTM neural networks [J]. 2018, 444(135-52.
    [50] AHMAD K, MARYAM B I, MOLOOD A E.A novel adaptive learning path method; proceedings of the 4th International Conference on e-Learning and e-Teaching (ICELET 2013), F, 2013 [C]. IEEE.
    [51] KRISHNA K, MURTY M N J I T O S, MAN,, CYBERNETICS P B. Genetic K-means algorithm [J]. 1999, 29(3): 433-9.
    [52] DORIGO M, BIRATTARI M, STUTZLE T J I C I M. Ant colony optimization [J]. 2006, 1(4): 28-39.
    [53] GOVINDARAJAN K, KUMAR V S. Dynamic learning path prediction—A learning analytics solution; proceedings of the 2016 IEEE eighth international conference on technology for education (T4E), F, 2016 [C]. IEEE.
    [54] XU J, XING T, VAN DER SCHAAR M J I T O S P. Personalized course sequence recommendations [J]. 2016, 64(20): 5340-52.
    [55] INTAYOAD W, KAMYOD C, TEMDEE P. Reinforcement learning for online learning recommendation system; proceedings of the 2018 Global Wireless Summit (GWS), F, 2018 [C]. IEEE.
    [56] CAI D, ZHANG Y, DAI B. Learning Path Recommendation Based on Knowledge Tracing Model and Reinforcement Learning; proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC), F, 2019 [C]. IEEE.
    [57] TANG X, CHEN Y, LI X, et al. A reinforcement learning approach to personalized learning recommendation systems [J]. 2019, 72(1): 108-35.
    [58] LI YQ, ZHANG WS, YANG L, et al. Research and application of label-based reinforcement learning recommendation algorithm [J]. 2010, 27(8): 2845-7+ 52.
    [59] VESIN B, BUDIMAC Z J C, INFORMATICS. Applying recommender systems and adaptive hypermedia for e-learning personalizatio [J]. 2013, 32(3): 629-59.
    [60] YANG T-C, HWANG G-J, YANG S J-H J J O E T, et al. Development of an adaptive learning system with multiple perspectives based on students'' learning styles and cognitive styles [J]. 2013, 16(4): 185-200.
    [61] LI J-W, CHANG Y-C, CHU C-P, et al. A self-adjusting e-course generation process for personalized learning [J]. 2012, 39(3): 3223-32.
    [62] SHANI G, GUNAWARDANA A. Evaluating recommendation systems [M]. Recommender systems handbook. Springer. 2011: 257-97.
    [63] RICCI F, ROKACH L, SHAPIRA B. Introduction to recommender systems handbook [M]. Recommender systems handbook. Springer. 2011: 1-35.
    [64] LIU H, LI X J S C. Learning path combination recommendation based on the learning networks [J]. 2020, 24(6): 4427-39.
    [65] SHAWKY D, BADAWI A. A reinforcement learning-based adaptive learning system; proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Machine Learning Technologies and Applications, F, 2018 [C]. Springer.
    [66] ZHANG Z, BRUN A, BOYER A. New Measures for Offline Evaluation of Learning Path Recommenders; proceedings of the European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning, F, 2020 [C]. Springer.
    [67] JANSSEN J, BERLANGA A J, HEYENRATH S, et al. Assessing the learning path specification: A pragmatic quality approach [J]. 2010, 16(21): 3191-209.
    [68] SU C J E J O M, SCIENCE, EDUCATION T. Designing and developing a novel hybrid adaptive learning path recommendation system (ALPRS) for gamification mathematics geometry course [J]. 2017, 13(6): 2275-98.
    [69] HSIAO S-W, KO Y-C, LO C-H, et al. An ISM, DEI, and ANP based approach for product family development [J]. 2013, 27(1): 131-48.
    [70] NIKNAM M, THULASIRAMAN P J E, TECHNOLOGIES I. LPR: A bio-inspired intelligent learning path recommendation system based on meaningful learning theory [J]. 2020, 25(5): 3797-819.
    [71] YANG J, LIU H, HUANG Z. Smap: To generate the personalized learning paths for different learning style learners; proceedings of the International Conference on Technologies for E-Learning and Digital Entertainment, F, 2010 [C]. Springer.
    [72] TAM V, LAM E Y, FUNG S. Toward a complete e-learning system framework for semantic analysis, concept clustering and learning path optimization; proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 12th international conference on advanced learning technologies, F, 2012 [C]. IEEE.
    [73] YANG F, LI F W, LAU R W. An open model for learning path construction; proceedings of the International Conference on Web-Based Learning, F, 2010 [C]. Springer.
    [74] LARSON L C, MILLER T N J K D P R. 21st century skills: Prepare students for the future [J]. 2011, 47(3): 121-3.
    [75] HUITT W J E P I. Bloom et al.''s taxonomy of the cognitive domain [J]. 2011, 22(
    [76] BLOOM B S J N Y M. Taxonomy of educational objectives. Vol. 1: Cognitive domain [J]. 1956, 20(24.
    [77] CHRISTUDAS B C L, KIRUBAKARAN E, THANGAIAH P R J J T, et al. An evolutionary approach for personalization of content delivery in e-learning systems based on learner behavior forcing compatibility of learning materials [J]. 2018, 35(3): 520-33.
    [78] LI MQ, KOU JS, LIN D, et al. Basic theory and application of genetic algorithms [M]. Ke xue chu ban she, 2002.
    [79] ZHANG LB, ZHOU CG, MA M, et al. Particle swarm based algorithm for solving multi-objective optimization problems [D], 2004.
    [80] LI W, ZHANG L. Personalized learning path generation based on network embedding and learning effects; proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 10th International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science (ICSESS), F, 2019 [C]. IEEE.
    [81] NABIZADEH A H, JORGE A M, LEAL J P J E S. Estimating time and score uncertainty in generating successful learning paths under time constraints [J]. 2019, 36(2): e12351.
    [82] HWANG G-J, KUO F-R, YIN P-Y, et al. A heuristic algorithm for planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning [J]. 2010, 54(2): 404-15.
    [83] TARJAN R J S J O C. Depth-first search and linear graph algorithms [J]. 1972, 1(2): 146-60.
    [84] VANITHA V, KRISHNAN P, ELAKKIYA R J C, et al. Collaborative optimization algorithm for learning path construction in E-learning [J]. 2019, 77(325-38.
    [85] ZHAO Q, ZHANG Y, CHEN J. An improved ant colony optimization algorithm for recommendation of micro-learning path; proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (CIT), F, 2016 [C]. IEEE.
    [86] ZAPOROZHKO V V, BOLODURINA I P, PARFENOV D I. A genetic-algorithm approach for forming individual educational trajectories for listeners of online courses; proceedings of the In Proceedings of Russian Federation & Europe Multidiciplinary Symposium on Computer Science and ICT, F, 2018 [C].
    [87] YE J-M, SONG X, CHEN X, et al. Research on learning path recommendation algorithms in online learning community [J]. 2018, ecar):
    [88] DWIVEDI P, KANT V, BHARADWAJ K K J E, et al. Learning path recommendation based on modified variable length genetic algorithm [J]. 2018, 23(2): 819-36.
    [89] VANITHA V, KRISHNAN P J J O I, SYSTEMS F. A modified ant colony algorithm for personalized learning path construction [J]. 2019, 37(5): 6785-800.
    [90] JEBARI K, EL MOUJAHID A, BOUROUMI A, et al. Genetic algorithms for online remedial education based on competency approach; proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems, F, 2011 [C]. IEEE.
    [91] DE-MARCOS L, MARTINEZ J-J, GUTIERREZ J-A, et al. Genetic algorithms for courseware engineering [J]. 2011, 7(7): 1-27.
    [92] WANG T-I, WANG K-T, HUANG Y-M J E S W A. Using a style-based ant colony system for adaptive learning [J]. 2008, 34(4): 2449-64.
    [93] ELSHANI L, NU?I K P J A P A. Constructing a personalized learning path using genetic algorithms approach [J]. 2021,
    [94] ROTHLAUF F. Representations for evolutionary algorithms; proceedings of the Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference: Late Breaking Papers, F, 2009 [C].
    [95] JORDAN M I, MITCHELL T M J S. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects [J]. 2015, 349(6245): 255-60.
    [96] CHEN C-M J C, EDUCATION. Intelligent web-based learning system with personalized learning path guidance [J]. 2008, 51(2): 787-814.
    [97] WANG R, ZA?ANE O R. Sequence-based approaches to course recommender systems; proceedings of the International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications, F, 2018 [C]. Springer.
    [98] WANG X, ZHANG Y, YU S, et al. E-learning recommendation framework based on deep learning; proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), F, 2017 [C]. IEEE.
    [99] KRAUSS C. Time-dependent recommender systems for the prediction of appropriate learning objects [M]. Technische Universitaet Berlin (Germany), 2018.
    [100] LIKAS A, VLASSIS N, VERBEEK J J J P R. The global k-means clustering algorithm [J]. 2003, 36(2): 451-61.
    [101] ALEKSANDRA, KLA?NJA-MILI?EVI?, AND, et al. E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification [J]. 2011,
    [102] AGGARWAL C C, ZHAI C. A survey of text classification algorithms [M]. Mining text data. Springer. 2012: 163-222.
    [103] TARAGHI B, SARANTI A, EBNER M, et al. Markov chain and classification of difficulty levels enhances the learning path in one digit multiplication; proceedings of the International Conference on Learning and Collaboration Technologies, F, 2014 [C]. Springer.
    [104] SURYANI M, HASIBUAN Z J I. The Study of Dynamic Delivery Adaptive Learning Mining and Ontology Approach [J]. 2013, 978-9.
    [105] SAFAVIAN S R, LANDGREBE D J I T O S, MAN,, CYBERNETICS. A survey of decision tree classifier methodology [J]. 1991, 21(3): 660-74.
    [106] PRITZKER S R, RUNCO M A. Encyclopedia of creativity [M]. Academic Press/Elsevier, 2011.
    [107] HALLER C S, COURVOISIER D S J P O A, CREATIVITY,, ARTS T. Personality and thinking style in different creative domains [J]. 2010, 4(3): 149.
    [108] GRAF S, VIOLA S R, LEO T, et al. In-depth analysis of the Felder-Silverman learning style dimensions [J]. 2007, 40(1): 79-93.
    [109] FOURNIER-VIGER P, FAGHIHI U, NKAMBOU R, et al. Exploiting sequential patterns found in users'' solutions and virtual tutor behavior to improve assistance in ITS [J]. 2010, 13(1): 13-24.
    [110] ALIAN M, JABRI R J J O A S. A shortest adaptive learning path in eLearning systems: Mathematical view [J]. 2009, 5(6): 32-42.
    [111] GONG J, WANG S, WANG J, et al. Attentional Graph Convolutional Networks for Knowledge Concept Recommendation in MOOCs in a Heterogeneous View; proceedings of the Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, F, 2020 [C].
    [112] SCHWAB M, STROBELT H, TOMPKIN J, et al. booc. io: An education system with hierarchical concept maps and dynamic non-linear learning plans [J]. 2016, 23(1): 571-80.
    [113] SHI D, WANG T, XING H, et al. A learning path recommendation model based on a multidimensional knowledge graph framework for e-learning [J]. 2020, 195(105618.
    [114] SHU J, SHEN X, LIU H, et al. A content-based recommendation algorithm for learning resources [J]. 2018, 24(2): 163-73.
    [115] SHEN X, YI B, ZHANG Z, et al. Automatic recommendation technology for learning resources with convolutional neural network; proceedings of the 2016 International Symposium on Educational Technology (ISET), F, 2016 [C]. IEEE.
    [116] IDRIS N, YUSOF N, SAAD P J I J A S C A. Adaptive course sequencing for personalization of learning path using neural network [J]. 2009, 1(1): 49-61.
    [117] MANSUR A B F, YUSOF N, BASORI A H J P C S. Personalized Learning Model based on Deep Learning Algorithm for Student Behaviour Analytic [J]. 2019, 163(125-33.
    [118] SAITO T, WATANOBE Y J I J O D E T. Learning path recommendation system for programming education based on neural networks [J]. 2020, 18(1): 36-64.
    [119] SAITO T, WATANOBE Y. Learning path recommender system based on recurrent neural network; proceedings of the 2018 9th International Conference on Awareness Science and Technology (iCAST), F, 2018 [C]. IEEE.
    [120] FERRETTI S, MIRRI S, PRANDI C, et al. Automatic web content personalization through reinforcement learning [J]. 2016, 121(157-69.
    [121] SHAWKY D, BADAWI A. Towards a personalized learning experience using reinforcement learning [M]. Machine learning paradigms: Theory and application. Springer. 2019: 169-87.
    [122] LI X, XU H, ZHANG J, et al. Optimal hierarchical learning path design with reinforcement learning [J]. 2021, 45(1): 54-70.
    [123] EL FAZAZI H, ELGAREJ M, QBADOU M, et al. Design of an Adaptive e-Learning System based on Multi-Agent Approach and Reinforcement Learning [J]. 2021, 11(1): 6637-44.
    [124] INTAYOAD W, KAMYOD C, TEMDEE P J W P C. Reinforcement Learning Based on Contextual Bandits for Personalized Online Learning Recommendation Systems [J]. 2020, 1-16.
    相似文献
    引证文献
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:973
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-08
  • 最后修改日期:2021-10-09
  • 录用日期:2021-10-15
文章二维码
您是第20050517位访问者
版权所有:中国科学院软件研究所 京ICP备05046678号-3
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南四街4号,邮政编码:100190
电话:010-62562563 传真:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

京公网安备 11040202500063号