基于混合遗传模拟退火算法的SaaS构件优化放置
作者:
基金项目:

国家科技支撑计划(2014BAF07B02);国家自然科学基金(61432002);山东省重大科技专项(2015ZDXX0201B02);山东省自然科学基金(2015ZRA10032)


Solving SaaS Components Optimization Placement Problem with Hybird Genetic and Simulated Annealing Algorithm
Author:
Fund Project:

National Key R&D Plan Project of China (2014BAF07B02); National Natural Science Foundation of China (61432002); Major Scienece & Technology Specific Project of Shandong Province (2015ZDXX0201B02); Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province (2015ZRA10032)

  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [22]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目前,对于SaaS优化放置问题的研究都是假定云环境中的虚拟机的种类和数量都是确定的,即,在限定的资源范围内进行优化.然而,在公有云环境下,SaaS提供者所需要的云资源数量是不确定的,其需要根据IaaS提供者所提供的虚拟机种类以及被部署的SaaS构件的资源需求来确定.为此,站在SaaS提供者角度,提出一种新的SaaS构件优化放置问题模型,并采用混合遗传模拟退火算法(hybrid genetic and simulated annealing algorithm,简称HGSA)对该问题进行求解.HGSA结合了遗传算法和模拟退火算法的优点,克服了遗传算法收敛速度慢和模拟退火算法容易陷入局部最优的缺点,与单独使用遗传算法和模拟退火算法相比,实验结果表明,HGSA在求解SaaS构件优化放置问题方面具有更高的求解质量.所提出的方法为SaaS服务模式的大规模应用提供了理论与方法的支撑.

    Abstract:

    Current researches on SaaS(software as a service) optimization placement mostly assume that the types and number of virtual machines are constant in cloud environment, namely, the optimization placement is based on the restricted resource. However, in actual situation the types and number of virtual machines are unknown, and they need to been calculated according to the resource requirement of components deployed. To address the issue, from the view of SaaS providers, this paper proposes a new approach to SaaS optimization placement problem that not only is applied to initial deployment of SaaS, but also is applied to component dynamic deployment in the running phase of SaaS. A hybrid genetic and simulated annealing algorithm(HGSA) is used in this approach that combines the advantages of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm, and overcomes the problems of the premature of genetic algorithm and the lower convergence speed. Compared with the separated using of genetic algorithm and simulated annealing algorithm, the experimental results show that HGSA has higher quality in solving the problem of SaaS component optimization placements. The approach proposed in this paper will provide the support of theory and method for the large-scale application of SaaS service mode.

    参考文献
    [1] Kang S, Kang S, Hur S. A design of the conceptual architecture for a multitenant SaaS application platform. In:Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Computers, Networks, Systems, and Industrial Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011. 462-467.[doi:10.1109/CNSI.2011.56]
    [2] Zhang Y, Wang ZH, Gao B, Guo CJ, Sun W, Li XP. An effective heuristic for on-line tenant placement problem in SaaS. In:Proc. of the 2010 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Web Services. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2010. 425-432.[doi:10.1109/ICWS.2010.65]
    [3] Yu HY, Wang DH. System resource allocation algorithm for multi-tenant SaaS application. In:Proc of the 2011 Int'l Conf. on Cloud and Service Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011. 207-211.[doi:10.1109/CSC.2011.6138523]
    [4] Wu LL, Garg SK, Buyya R. SLA-Based admission control for a software-as-a-service provider in cloud computing environments. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2012,78(5):1280-1299.[doi:10.1016/j.jcss.2011.12.014]
    [5] Yang EF, Zhang Y, Wu L, Liu YL, Liu SJ. A hybrid approach to placement of tenants for service-based multi-tenant SaaS application. In:Proc. of the 2011 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conf. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011. 124-130.[doi:10.1109/APSCC.2011.35]
    [6] Tian C, Jiang HB, Iyengar A, Liu X, Wu ZD, Chen JH, Liu WY, Wang CG. Improving application placement for cluster-based Web applications. IEEE Trans. on Network and Service Management, 2011,8(2):104-115.[doi:10.1109/TNSM.2011.050311. 100040]
    [7] Yusoh ZIM, Tang M. Composite SaaS placement and resource optimization in cloud computing using evolutionary algorithms. In:Proc. of the 2012 IEEE 5th Int'l Conf. on the Cloud Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2012. 590-597.[doi:10.1109/CLOUD.2012.61]
    [8] Lloyd W, Pallickara S, David O, LyonbAuthor J, ArabibAuthor M, Rojas K. Performance implications of multi-tier application deployments on infrastructure-as-a-service clouds:Towards performance modeling. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2013, 29(5):1254-1264.[doi:10.1016/j.future.2012.12.007]
    [9] Moens H, Truyen E, Walraven S, Joosen W, Dhoedt B, De Turck F. Cost-Effective feature placement of customizable multi-tenant application in the cloud. Journal of Network System Management, 2014,22(4):517-588.[doi:10.1007/s10922-013-9265-5]
    [10] Zhu XY, Santos C, Beyer D, Ward J, Singhal S. Automated application component placement in data centers using mathematical programming. Int'l Journal of Network Management, 2008,18:467-483.[doi:10.1002/nem.707]
    [11] Jin ZH, Cao J, Li ML. A distributed application component placement approach for cloud computing environment. In:Proc. of the 9th IEEE Int'l Conf. on Dependable, Automic and Secure Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2011. 488-495.[doi:10. 1109/DASC.2011.94]
    [12] Sailer A, Head MR, Kochut A, Shaikh H. Graph-Based cloud service placement. In:Proc. of the 2010 IEEE Int'l Conf. on Services Computing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2010. 89-96.[doi:10.1109/SCC.2010.67]
    [13] Pisinger D. An exact algorithm for large multiple knapsack problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 1999,114(3):528-541.[doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00120-9]
    [14] Kataoka S, Yamada T. Upper and lower bounding procedures for the multiple knapsack assignment problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014,237(2):440-447.[doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.014]
    [15] Sarac T, Sipahioglu A. Generalized quadratic multiple knapsack problem and two solution approaches. Computer & Operations Research, 2014,43:78-89.[doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.08.018]
    [16] Ren ZG, Feng ZR, Zhang AM. Fusing ant colony optimization with Lagrangian relaxation for the multiple-choice multidimensional knapsack problem. Information Science, 2012,182(1):15-29.[doi:10.1016/j.ins.2011.07.033]
    [17] Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, Meyarivan T. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm:NSGA-Ⅱ. IEEE Trans. on Evolutionary Computation, 2002,6(2):182-197.[doi:10.1109/4235.996017]
    [18] McCall J. Genetic algorithms for modelling and optimization. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 2005,184(1):205-222.[doi:10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.034]
    [19] Chen D, Lee CY, Park CH. Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing(HGASA) in global function optimization. In:Proc. of the 17th IEEE Int'l Conf. on Tools with Artificial Intelligence. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2005. 113-117.[doi:10.1109/ICTAI.2005.72]
    [20] Li WD, Ong SK, Nee AYC. Hybrid genetic algorithm and simulated annealing approach for the optimization of process plans for prismatic parts. Int'l Journal of Production Research, 2002,40(8):1899-1922.[doi:10.1080/00207540110119991]
    [21] Loukil L, Mehdi M, Mebab N. A parallel hybrid genetic algorithm-simulated annealing for solving Q3AP on computational grid. In:Proc. of the IEEE Int'l Symp. on Parallel & Distributed Processing. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2009. 1-8.[doi:10.1109/IPDPS. 2009.5161126]
    [22] Li YH, Guo H, Wang L, Fu J. A hybrid genetic-simulated annealing algorithm for the location-inventory-routing problem considering returns under E-supply chain environment. The Scientific World Journal, 2013.[doi:10.1155/2013/125893]
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

孟凡超,初佃辉,李克秋,周学权.基于混合遗传模拟退火算法的SaaS构件优化放置.软件学报,2016,27(4):916-932

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:5216
  • 下载次数: 7223
  • HTML阅读次数: 2798
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-06-30
  • 最后修改日期:2015-10-15
  • 在线发布日期: 2016-01-14
文章二维码
您是第19892238位访问者
版权所有:中国科学院软件研究所 京ICP备05046678号-3
地址:北京市海淀区中关村南四街4号,邮政编码:100190
电话:010-62562563 传真:010-62562533 Email:jos@iscas.ac.cn
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司

京公网安备 11040202500063号